Thursday, 1 May 2014

Exercise: A Copy of a Painting, Part 3, Assignment 3

Part 3, Assignment 3 – A Copy of a Painting 

Notes on Making a Copy of 9x9x9: My Private Greens/Leaving

I am so glad I live in the centre of London, as if gives me lots of opportunity to see works of art first-hand, and my aim after this course is finished is to study a Painting course. So I was very keen to choose the “copy” option for this assignment. I spend a lot of time in galleries, and had been looking forward to his part of the course as I was quietly confident that could easily make an attempt at a faithful copy of one of my favourite works of art. But when I read the assignment carefully – always a good idea! - I realised that I wouldn't necessarily learn as much as if I tried to concentrate on certain aspects of a painting by making a more creative variation. So here goes.......

Just to make sure I stretched myself as much as possible, I decided to go to a gallery I had never visited previously, to see abstract works of art (which I find difficult to “read” or understand fully), in the hope that I would learn something in the process. Hence my choice of the White Cube Gallery in Bermondsey, London, where I could spend a few hours working from an original painting.

The first thing that struck me when I entered the White Cube for the first time was how light and spacious and calm it felt. That is, until I entered the 9m x 9m x 9m cubic room that was showing an installation by German artist Franz Ackermann. This room exuded energy and was anything but calm. Personal travel and the cult of tourism is the subject of Ackermann's installation, which takes the same name as the dimensions of the room for which it was specially made. 



  


I can't say I liked it at first sight – garish colours, almost cartoon-like compositions with abstract collages on a giant scale hung in a room where the walls themselves have been covered in murals of simplified tree outlines and panels of dark flat colour – but I was interested enough in the subject to sit down and try to understand what Ackermann was saying in this installation. There was little information at the gallery about the work being shown, apart from a paragraph of biographical detail and a short description of his process of making postcard-sized coloured drawings or “mental maps” to capture his visual memories as he travels and incorporating these images into paintings when he was back in his studio. (Sounds like a really good idea – I think I'll try this myself!) What is clear is that it would be impossible to work from photographs or reproductions of this installation, as the room itself is part of the work, and the high ceiling and wall murals are part of the experience. 
 
My attention was drawn to one piece of work in particular, “My Private Greens/Leaving” - an enormous 10' long oil painting with a large aeroplane dominating the composition on the left side. (see below) There are no people at all in any of the works in 9x9x9 although there is lots of evidence of human activity.  



My Private Greens/Leaving 266 x 540cm oil on canvas

The painting is hung in the middle of a 9x9m wall, which itself has been covered with a dark blue background mural with a 3-dimensional box-like painting above. The mural gives the impression that the painting is somehow coming forwards towards the viewer, and the trompe l'oeil effect of the mural above seems to suggest the infinity of space – the great blue yonder. 
 
The first thing I noticed about the painting was loud COLOUR. There are some immediately obvious differences in the colours used between the top half and the bottom half. In the photographs I took below, the top half is mainly cool colours, blues and lilacs and purples, with some flashes of bright yellow highlights on each side. There is more detail in this top half, fewer areas of solid colour, and more “mini landscapes/cityscapes” than in the lower half. The pale blue of the large plane on the left of the painting is repeated across this half in small areas, leading the eye across from left to right. There are few of the darkest tones in this half of the painting, apart from the door-like rectangles on the right.

 
    Top half of My Private Greens/Leaving

The picture below of the bottom half of the painting, shows a doughnut-shaped circle of warm colours surrounding a central area of very cool colours, mostly in a mid-tone. There are very few light colours in this half of the painting, apart from the bright yellow highlights and the light blues, This half also contains most of the darkest tones in the painting, creating much energy from the contrast of the primary reds against the cool blues, and secondary oranges against the purples. These two halves work independently too – no golden ratio here.

 
    Bottom half of My Private Greens/Leaving

So the first thing I did, long before I started my sketches of this painting, was to sit and look at it for a good 10-15 minutes, to get used to the bright colours and the energy that I felt in the room. This was time well spent, as the more I looked, the more I saw. I also looked at the scant information given at the gallery entrance, on the installation. The paintings were obviously done over a period of some years, between 2007 and 2014, although most were completed in 2013 and 2014, specially for this room.
 
The gallery information stated that Franz Ackermann began his artistic career by making "Mental Maps." No bigger than postcards, these coloured-pencil drawings captured his memories of walks around Hong Kong. The German artist had moved there when he finished graduate school because he wanted to get the feel for an unfamiliar city without the benefit of knowing its language. Ultimately, his goal was to convey the rhythm of his trips around town abstractly, by means of colour, line, and shape. 


Manfred Pernice sculpture
Trias Romana 1525 Matthias Grunewald
Interviewed for Frieze Magazine while exhibiting at the London Triennial in 2009, Ackermann was asked what pieces of art really mattered to him, and stated that Manfred Pernice's work (above left), particularly his unititled ashtray sculpture (1994), with its models of buildings which "investigate the interlacing of personal / public, via neutral stripped back and extracted forms from the built environment juxtaposed and overlayed with hints of narrative detail" was a favourite; along with the 1525 portrait drawing by Matthias Grunewald entitled "Trias Romana" (above right) which hangs in his workspace. But his "favourite piece of art" is Roger van der Weyden's "Portrait of a Lady" (below).

"Portrait of a Lady",  Rogier van der Leyden (1460)






I found it unusual that two out of the three peices of art that Ackermann describes as really mattering to him are portraits, as I have not been able to find any portrait work of his that suggests this genre is one he is interested in. Pernice's work is easier to link to Ackermann's as they both like to use found materials and a mixture of collage in their works, and are heavily influenced by scenes of urban architecture.

Over the last twenty years, Ackermann has picked up the pace of his travels and increased the size of his works. His two gigantic murals, Coming Home and (Meet Me) At the Waterfall (both 2009) started off as recollections of his journey from his home town, Berlin, to the North Texas area, where he did even more sightseeing. Ackermann then made many drawings, watercolours, and paintings, all based on what he had seen. To translate these studies to the walls of the stadium he used projectors and a crew of eight assistants, all artists in their own right. 
 
His pair of wrap-around landscapes lets viewers experience the excitement of travel through the past and the present. Texas Stadium appears in the distance, a fond memory amid pulsating shapes and jazzy colour-combinations. To take in the magnificent murals is to take a trip, in the imagination, to a place never before visited, as did German painters Vasily Kandinsky and Franz Marc at the beginning of the 20th century. Ackermann updates their Expressionist abstractions, turning art into an urban adventure. 
 
As I sat for a few hours making my drawings of My private Greens/Leaving, I really began to get used to to the bright colour and found the painting more and more interesting. I was energised, and felt that Ackermann really managed to convey the excitement of travel and the overwhelming range of feelings when leaving on a journey. I felt I was looking though a kaleidoscope at the beginning, or remembering the Susan Collier & Sarah Campbell 1972 fabric (right) which I bought once to make a blind, and still have it. This in itself was like the silk tapestry called Reg-Green (below) by Gunta Stolzl ( 1927) of the Bauhaus, which I found when doing by research for Project 1 of Assignment 3! (below)



The other feeling I was having as I did my work in the gallery on that first day was that I was looking at very modern stained glass windows, a feeling that was helped along by the height of the ceiling – 9 metres – in this square room with walls behind alternating between dark blocks of colour and murals of enormous tree trunks.These murals on the walls behind the paintings also helped to make me feel quite small in comparison.

The painting I chose to copy was definitely my favourite because it appeared quite complex at first glance, yet I found myself “seeing” a narrative. Perhaps it was because I had just returned from a journey by plane the previous day, or perhaps it was because I have spent so much of my life travelling on long-haul flights, but I was drawn to dig deeper and try to analyse the design, the colour and general technique behind it by looking it at it through the stated goal of Ackermann of trying to “to convey the rhythm of his trips around town abstractly, by means of colour, line, and shape. “ Some parts look like perspective drawings of urban areas; others fragments of landscape; others organic shapes. But definitely no people........I wonder how Ackermann can travel without memories of people.....

My first attempt in the gallery was to sketch the general shapes of the tonal areas, which I divided roughly into Light tones, Warm Mid-tones and Cool Mid-tones, and Dark tones, using little tubes of acrylic paint and very little water, to create the areas of flat colour which Ackermann used so much in this painting. (This choice was made purely on the basis of ease, as oils were not allowed in the gallery, and would have been too messy. The advantage of these little tubes is that paint can be used straight from the tube, with little need for mixing and little need for much water, and they are very quick drying.)



What became obvious when I was doing this sketch was that Ackermann had had to put quite a lot of thought into which colours were next to others; where to create contrast and where to create harmony; where to create warmth and where to suggest sterility; where to suggest order and where to suggest chaos; where to suggest movement and where to suggest stability; where to use large blocks of colour and where to use small highlights. I took lots of photos of small details of the painting to work on at home, in a way trying to emulate Ackermann's way of postcard-sized mind-maps to help me recall the experience when at home. I can really see why this works for Ackermann – it's a great way of prodding your memory, especially if you record lots of detail without worrying about the subject. And of course, looking for a long time really helped.
 
The next attempt at a copy was on an A3 piece of paper – quite difficult to manipulate in the gallery, but I really felt there was so much going on in the painting that I wanted to work on a larger scale. This time, I tried to concentrate on the CREATIVE VARIATION that the exercise talked about on page 105. This meant really trying to think about the narrative that Ackerman was trying to illustrate in his painting. I started off with the obvious shape of the blue aeroplane which takes up most of the top left quadrant. I decided to use a mixture of felt tipped pens and Inktense pencils, which would allow me to block in large areas of colour to be finished off at home, I looked at the basic shaped he had used, and it became clear when I kept looking that I could make out lots of circles and ovals (which I hadn't noticed at the beginning), both in the windows of the plane, the wheels, and in the brightly coloured yellow and orange highlights that seen throughout the composition. He also used lots of squares and rectangles, especially in the top right quadrant, where they resemble buildings, the chequerboard areas above the plane's tail and the landscape-like field areas in the foreground and along the fuselage. The shapes in the lower half of the painting are much more irregular, resembling jagged rocks in some areas, or mountain ranges seen from a distance. The one basic shape that is quite uncommon in the picture is the triangle, apart from one area in the top right which resembles a very regularly patterned edging of spikes and another area just underneath to the right which looks like an abstract tree shape.

Below is my finished attempt at a CREATIVE VARIATION of a VISUAL THEME, completed at home with some acrylic paint over the felt tipped pen in some areas. I have simplified the original somewhat and exaggerated what I thought were the visual memories Ackermann was trying to illustrate in others For example, I have incorporated some trees into my painting, and exaggerated the organic shapes of what I think could be landscapes in the lower half, and making the area above the plane in the top left full of many more obviously technical and industrial looking shapes. But the slightly menacing feel of the central blue area being swallowed up by the encroaching red and orange creeping “menace” I have kept, as I understand from the reading that Ackermann is not a huge fan of the travel and tourism industry (although he appears to be one of its greatest customers!)


For my last attempt at creating a copy of this work, I decided to do something a little different from the paint and pens used before, and instead went back to my original feeling that I was looking at a stained glass window. This feeling had been quite strong when I sat in the gallery on my own for quite long periods, contemplating the work in silence. So this time, I used a collection of old magazines and started to tear up bits of paper, some of colours and some of specific photos. As I read more about Ackermann at home, and watched an interview where he talked about what motivates him in art, I realised that the painting I had chosen to copy was unusual compared to the others that form 9x9x9 because it doesn't incorporate any photography or phot0-montage. Ackermann often combines drawing, photography and painting all in his works, in a way that does not imply the classical hierarchy of painting being at the top and the others being a lesser art form. So for this last attempt, I wanted to combine images and shapes of torn paper and pure printed colour just to see what I could come up with. It has inspired me to try this when I do my next (painting) course! And here it is:-



Some areas I have filled in with felt-tipped pen, but most is from paper torn or cut to shape and size, and some pictures have been drawn over. I have included several EYES and shapes of eyes because this, in the end, is what I took most from the exercise in general and the painting in particular. I found it enormously helpful to take a lot more time than usual to take in more aspects of the work and let them “sink in” before moving to the next work in the gallery. I suppose what I'm saying is that my first response to a work is usually an emotional one, and that I should get beyond that to an intellectual response before really appreciating a work. (I wonder if that is true of me in real life? Do I respond first in an emotional way to new things? - probably, as the fear/flight response is the first to kick in!) Ackermann is telling us about what he sees, and inviting us all to LOOK, LOOK, LOOK at what we are doing and what is out there, 
 
References:
Video:

web-sites:
www.whitecube.com/exhibitions/franz_ackermann_9x9x9_2014/
http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/franz_ackermann/


Friday, 28 March 2014

Exercise: A Symbol for the Present, Part 3 Project 2



                                                        

A Symbol of the Present

Preliminary thoughts.....

When I started to think about this project, I was drawn to some of the electronic kit that is iconic about 2014 – the iPod 5 series, for example, with its amazing high-res built-in camera and its ease of talking to others via FaceTime or listening to entire music collections on the go. Or the iPad, with its various apps for painting or drawing without any of the necessary equipment, and its library of books and magazines to read any time, anywhere. Or maybe GoogleGlass, the wearable technology development that hasn't quite hit the market yet. Or Tweets and Facebook, which have revolutionised the way we keep in touch with each other and report news as it happens anywhere on the planet. I want an international symbol, one that reflects changes in the way we think of each other. Maybe YouTube – even my 2-year-old grandchild has a daily diet of this.



And then there's wildlife and the environment to consider..........the shortage of water, the pollution of the earth, the destruction of the rainforest, the depletion of fish stocks......and that terrifying prospect,global warming. Maybe a wind turbine would be the answer........ This is difficult!



But.......somehow I stop myself from choosing a technological symbol, as I realise that a large proportion of the world is still struggling to gain access to a supplies of fresh clean water, and 27,000 babies die every day – over 10,000,000 every year! - from child poverty. We are more likely to answer an appeal for flood victims or earthquake victims (both natural disasters which we can't control) than to contribute to an appeal dealing with these ongoing human tragedies.



Then my eye was drawn to a headline about same-sex marriage, and I read that England and Wales (Scotland had already voted in favour) were legalising marriage between people of the same sex from March this year. This would make Britain one of about 20 countries in the world to recognise that stigmatizing gay couples is denying them legal protection through inheritance or hospital visitation rights for next-of-kin. In some cultures, homosexuality and lesbianism are actually criminal offences. I have always felt that gay people were born that way, and were powerless to change their nature, rather than believing it was a choice that contravened religious teaching and therefore immoral. 

There is certainly lots of evidence in nature, in the animal kingdom, to support the view that it is “normal” in many species, and one story in particular caught my eye because it 
described a long-term relationship between chin-strap penguins in New York Zoo, where
Roy  and Silo incubated a chick abandoned by another penguin, and reared her to
maturity. I love the idea of the animals being penguins, as I think the “coming in from the cold” symbolises what I hope will be a groundswell of legislation to give gay marriage the support itand reduces discrimination of this natural bahaviour. We need more love in the world, not more intolerance.
 


My starting point - a sketch of Roy and Silo entwining necks ( courting behaviour )

What I am symbolising:

I am symbolising that living things, including humans, lower order animals, and plants, exhibit attraction to and attractiveness for other same-sex organisms. Behaviours can include vocalisations, caring and nurturing of young, ecstasy and pleasure in the company of same-sex partners; and they can enjoy these relationships over the long term. They should be free to make these long-term commitments to one another, to raise families, and be accepted by society and the law as having the same rights as mixed-sex relationships. They can exhibit brain arousal patterns that show they are not choosing these behaviours, but are unconsciously driven. In other words, their behaviours are built-in and not learned, and are natural to them.

I also want to show that our disapproval of homosexual behaviour, and our criminalising of it for a long time, has placed homosexual people outside mainstream society, and deprived them of basic human rights. They have literally been “out in the cold” and still are in most countries of the world.



The symbol I will choose:

The symbol I will choose is therefore a sculpture of chinstrap penguins, showing courtship behaviours. I am slightly nervous that extreme right-wing groups will see my choice of an animal family and equate same-sex marriage with debased, instinctual behaviour that humans must fight by becoming civilised, so have toyed with the idea of using a Henry Moore-like sculpture of The Family Group, but having 2 men in it instead of a man and a woman. I liked this option, but felt it wasn't original enough for this exercise, and it doesn't have the added advantage of showing behaviours that occur naturally in several animal species, including those closest to humans - the apes. Nor does it allow me to create a metaphor of "coming in from the cold" as I am able to do by choosing an animal that comes from an ice-bound environment to one of relative warmth, both real and emotional.
 

Henry Moore: The Family Group, Photo Tate Org


My early sketch of a proposed Family Group with 2 Male figures



After trying out one or two ideas on paper of possible poses for my penguins, I decided that the final symbol I will choose is an enormous (30' high) stainless-steel-ribbon-framed structure in the shape of the 2 chinstrap penguins, showing courting behaviour. I want to illustrate something that is fundamental to the human condition – the fact that we are all social beings who form long-standing relationships with others and depend on these for our mental well-being BUT we have been denying a sizeable proportion of the population (i.e. those who choose same-sex partners) the right to formalise their relationship in a legally recognised way – marriage. The latest legislation is a milestone in addressing one of the areas in which we discriminated in society. 
 

My next sketches were looking at the ways chinstrap penguins display courtship behaviours and I chose bowing with heads well down for the first one, which I discarded because it resulted in an outline which looked too heart-shaped and this sculpture is not so much about romance as about commitment and partnership. In the second sketch the two penguins' beaks are touching, but again I felt it looked too much like they were kissing each



other and I don't want to trivialise the sculpture by making it seem too twee.

Three preliminary sketches of penguin courtship behaviour.



My favourite sketch is the third one, where the two are facing each other, flippers out-stretched, and vocalising. I really like this one, because it looks most celebratory, as if

the animals were calling out to everyone. I like the way they are looking up - an optimistic stance; but also in psychological terms, perhaps they are looking back into their memories of the long road it has been to get to this point.



In the end, I decided not to have a chick in the composition, as I preferred the nest of stones to represent setting up a home together, rather than starting a family. This new Law is not just about families after all, but about formalising the choice of a life partner, which does not include having children for an increasing number of people.



I have also decided to have it made from ribbons of stainless-steel so that it is mostly transparent. This is to represent the fact that single-sex partners have nothing to hide and can be looked at from any angle – seen right through – for what they are, without fear of judgement. The heads and feet will be solid, painted in black and white, as will the feet and tail feathers. This is mainly for dramatic effect and solidity, but also to emphasize their sameness.

"The Couple"



Who will I choose to make it?

I'd choose Antony Gormley to make this sculpture, as he is a contemplative man, whose works are on a large scale, and I'd place it in Hyde Park!